This media backgrounder on Paternity is intended to assist journalists and others interested in this topic to have an accurate understanding of service delivery and legislation issues relating to paternity decisions.
The law is very clear that only parents have to pay child support. A person is considered the parent of a child, and is therefore required to pay child support, if they:
If a child support application is refused, as CSA is not satisfied the person being asked to pay child support is a parent, the person claiming child support can apply to the Family Court or the Federal Magistrates Court or any State or Local Court exercising Family Law jurisdiction, for a declaration that the application should be accepted because the person is parent.
If one of the above criteria is met, the application for child support has been accepted and the person being asked to pay believes they are not the parent, they can apply to the Family Court or the Federal Magistrates Court or any State or Local Court exercising Family Law jurisdiction, for a declaration that the application should not have been accepted, as they are not a parent of the child. The Court can also make a decision about whether any child support that has already been paid should be repaid by the person who received it.
When a child is born as a result of an artificial conception procedure, for child support purposes, the parents of the child are the persons who are regarded as a parent under section 60H of the Family Law Act.
Under this Act, a child born as a result of an artificial conception procedure where a man and woman are married or in a de facto relationship will generally be regarded as a child of that man and woman (regardless of whether they are the child's biological parents).
The 'parents' must have consented to the procedure. This is assumed to be the case when the parents are married or in a de facto relationship unless a party can prove otherwise.
Depending on the State or Territory in which the family resides, there are some other circumstances under section 60H in which a person can be regarded as the parent of a child born from an artificial conception procedure.
Generally a person who provides sperm for artificial insemination will not be treated as the father of a child under Family Law or Child Support Law (unless a court has declared them to be a parent).
The Child Support Agency (CSA) has no legal power to make decisions about paternity; it is a matter for the courts.
When a person has applied to a Court for a declaration that the child support application should not have been accepted, as they are not a parent of the child, the CSA is legally required to continue the collection of child support but must suspend the transfer of that money to the receiving parent until the court has reached a decision.
If a Court makes a declaration that the child support application should not have been accepted as the person is not a parent, any money that is being held by CSA can be paid back (but not money that has already been paid to the receiving parent). The Court must also immediately consider whether they should order that the receiving parent repay previously paid child support – without requiring the person disputing parentage to make a separate Court application, as had been the case prior to January 2007. The legislation now clearly articulates the matters the Court must consider when deciding if a receiving parent should repay child support.
If a Court orders that the (previously) receiving parent repay child support payments, the (previously) paying person can ask the CSA to collect the ordered payments on their behalf. CSA will be able to collect these amounts in the same way that they collect child support.
Reporting of misattributed paternity in the media often cites references to the number of paternity tests conducted each year in Australia that show that the person being tested is not the father. These references can give the impression that misattributed paternity is occurring at a much higher rate than evidence suggests. This is because the figure is derived from a specific sample group – that is, people who have reason to believe paternity may have been misattributed – rather than showing the overall incidence of misattributed paternity in the general population.
Evidence-based Australian research shows that the actual rate of misattributed paternity in the general population is closer to 1 per cent and not more that 3 per cent.*
“Medical studies provide one of the best sources of evidence in relation to the incidence of non-paternity in the general population, given that they often derive their subjects on the basis of medical conditions that are unrelated to paternity issues…since the advent of DNA analysis, not one medical study in a Western country indicates a non-paternity rate of more than three per cent.”
If a court has made a declaration that a child support application should not have been accepted as the person applied against is not a parent, the receiving parent can then apply for child support against the actual parent of the child if their parentage can be established. This assessment will only apply from the date the application for assessment is lodged – it cannot be made retrospective.
Proof of parentage:
www.csa.gov.au/ChildSupportFormula/formulaAssessment.aspx#parentage
Parentage legal reference:
www.csa.gov.au/guide/2_2_4.htm
Call: 0434 605 144
Email: media@csa.gov.au
* Gilding, M. Rampant misattributed paternity: the creation of an urban myth, People and Place, vol. 13, no. 2, 2005